PiR2-IT
Start an engagement
PiR2-IT
Start an engagement
Security architecture for programmes where attack surface, compliance obligations and operational continuity matter most.
Security is bolted on late in delivery, when it is most expensive and least effective.
Audits are passed while the real risk exposure remains unclear.
Models stop reflecting the system as it actually changes.
Identity, access, data protection, network segmentation and security operations.
STRIDE, PASTA and tailored methods applied to the real system topology.
Identity-centric access and micro-segmentation for cloud, hybrid and distributed environments.
Evidence mapped to NIST CSF, ISO 27001, NIS2, DORA and sector frameworks.
Threat modelling and trust design for mission and classified environments.
Security for modernisation programmes and regulatory evidence packs.
Utilities, transport, health and public-sector platforms.
Current state, delivery friction, architecture debt and the decisions that must be made first.
Reference architecture, governance model, control points, sequencing and evidence structures.
Design authority, prototype validation and assurance reviews as the programme proceeds.
Architecture designs weaknesses out; penetration testing finds weaknesses in what has already been built. The two complement each other.
The choice is driven by your actual risk exposure and regulatory obligations, not by preference for a framework.
Yes — as independent review and additional senior capacity alongside the team.
Yes. AI systems have their own security surfaces, addressed together with AI governance and enterprise architecture.
PiR2-ITIndependent consulting for institutions, regulated sectors and high-trust programmes.